Meaning of Interpreted or Compiled in JavaScript

Computers cannot actually run the code that you write in JavaScript (or any other language for that matter). Computers can only run machine code. The machine code that a particular computer can run is defined within the processor that is going to run those commands and can be different for different processors. Obviously, writing machine code was difficult for people to do (is 125 an add command or is it 126 or perhaps 27). To get around that problem what are known as assembly  languages were created. These languages used more obvious names for the commands (such as ADD for adding) and thus did away with the need to remember the exact machine codes. Assembly languages still have a one to one relationship with the particular processor and machine code that the computer converts those commands into. Assembly Languages Must Be Compiled or Interpreted Very early on it was realized that easier to write languages were needed and that the computer itself could be used to translate those into the machine code instructions that the computer can actually understand. There were two approaches that could be taken with this translation and both alternatives were chosen (either one or the other will be used depending on the language being used and where it is being run). A compiled language is one where once the program has been written you feed the code through a program called a compiler and that produces a machine code version of the program. When you want to then run the program you just call the machine code version. If you make changes to the program you need to recompile it before being able to test the changed code. An interpreted language is one where the instructions are converted from what you have written into machine code as the program is being run. An interpreted language basically gets an instruction from the program source, converts it to machine code, runs that machine code and then grabs the next instruction from the source to repeat the process. Two Variants on Compiling and Interpreting One variant uses a two-stage process. With this variant, the source of your program is compiled not directly into the machine code but instead is converted to an assembly-like language that is still independent of the particular processor. When you want to run the code it then processes that compiled code through an interpreter specific to the processor so as to get the machine code appropriate to that processor. This approach has many of the benefits of compiling while maintaining processor independence since the same compiled code can be interpreted by many different processors. Java is one language that often uses this variant. The other variant is called a Just in Time compiler (or JIT). With this approach, you dont actually run the compiler after you have written your code. Instead, that happens automatically when you run the code. Using a Just in Time compiler the code isnt interpreted statement by statement, it is compiled all in one go each time when it is called to be run and then the compiled version that it just created is what gets run. This approach makes it look a lot like the code is being interpreted except that instead of errors only being found when the statement with the error is reached, any errors detected by the compiler result in none of the code being run instead of all of the code up to that point being run. PHP is an example of a language that usually uses just in time compilation. Is JavaScript Compiled or Interpreted? So now we know what interpreted  code  and compiled code  mean, the question we next need to answer is what does all of this have to do with JavaScript? Depending on exactly where you run your JavaScript the code may be compiled or interpreted or use either of the other two variants mentioned. Most of the time you are ​running your JavaScript in a web browser and there the JavaScript is usually interpreted. Interpreted languages are usually slower than compiled languages. There are two reasons for this. Firstly the code to be interpreted actually has to be interpreted before it can be run and  secondly, that has to happen every time that the statement is to be run (not only every time you run the JavaScript but if it is in a loop then it needs to be done every time around the loop). This means that code written in JavaScript will run slower than code written in many other languages. How does knowing this help us where JavaScript is the only language available for us to run across all web browsers? The JavaScript interpreter itself that is built into the web browser is not written in JavaScript.  Instead, it is written in some other language that was then compiled. What this means is that you can make your JavaScript run faster if you can take advantage of any commands that JavaScript provides that allow you to offload the task to the JavaScript engine itself. Examples for Getting JavaScript to Run Faster An example of this is that some but not all browsers have implemented a document.getElementsByClassName() method within the JavaScript engine while others have yet to do so. When we need this particular functionality we can make out code run faster in those browsers where the JavaScript engine provides it by using feature sensing to see if the method already exists and only creating our own version of that code in JavaScript when the JavaScript engine doesnt provide it for us. Where the JavaScript engine does provide that functionality it should run faster if we use that rather than running our own version written in JavaScript. The same applies to any processing that the JavaScript engine makes available for us to call directly. There will also be instances where JavaScript provides multiple ways of making the same request. In those  instances, one of the ways of accessing the information may be more specific than the other. For example document.getElementsByTagName(table)[0].tBodies and document.getElementsByTagName(table)[0].getElementsByTagName(tbody) both retrieve the same  nodelist  of the  tbody  tags in the first table in the web page however the first of these is a specific command for retrieving the  tbody  tags where the second identifies that we are retrieving  tbody  tags in a parameter and other values can be substituted to retrieve other tags. In most  browsers, the shorter and more specific variant of the code will run faster (in some instances much faster) than the second variant and so it makes sense to use the shorter and more specific version. It also makes the code easier to read and maintain. Now in many of these  cases, the actual difference in the processing time will be very small and it will only be when you add many such code choices together that you will get any noticeable difference in the time your code takes to run. It is fairly rare though that changing your code to make it run faster is going to make the code significantly longer or harder to maintain, and often the reverse will be true.There is also the added benefit that future versions of JavaScript engines may be created that speed up the more specific variant even further so that using the specific variant may mean that your code will run faster in the future without you having to change anything.

Paideia as Bildung in Germany in the Age of Enlightenment...

Paideia as Bildung in Germany in the Age of Enlightenment ABSTRACT: There have been many interpretations of Bildung in the history of German philosophy, from the Medieval mystics to the secularization of the Enlightenment. Wilhelm von Humboldts work at the end of the 18th century is a good example. He placed the idea of Bildung at the center of his work because it was rooted in a dynamic, transforming idea of the natural and human worlds while also being oriented toward a model of balance and perfection. Von Humboldts interpretation of modernity is characterized by a strong emphasis on change as well as the need to find criteria for guiding such a transformation that has no intrinsic or predetermined end. Love of classical antiquity†¦show more content†¦In this way, to render the semantic extent of the term, the meanings of forma and formatio and imago and imitatio are involved as well; and the following two concepts are implied: firstly the concept of production according to an order that gives rise to a form (to something subside nt on the basis of mutually congruent rules) and secondly the conformation of the said act to an image given as assumption, as a model endowed with an absolute value which this image must resemble or aim for. The original meaning of bilden, as the Deutsches Wà ¶rterbuch by Jacob and Wilhelm Grimm states, is that of a plastic activity on the sensory level and means giving shape, producing a certain object abiding to the rules which preside over the Art. In this case bilden is a synonym for gestalten and formieren. But the relationship of reproduction, and therefore of resemblance with respect to an image must be added to this , and this addition to an Urbild pushes bilden well beyond the pure and simple formation of an object and gives rise to the complex relationship between model and copy, original and reproduction which implies a very different approach to the question. Such a double meaning

Climate Change Economics and Policy Global Warming

Questions: 1. Why is the mitigation of GHGs characterised as a public good and what is the main implication of this? 2. Assume you are the principal advisor of the Minister for the Environment. The Minister has an upcoming media interview about a proposed carbon tax and would like precise and concise answers for the following potential topics. a) In three dot points explain the rationale for the governments intervention to mitigate climate change? b) In three dot points explain why a carbon tax is the preferred policy? 3. Write a one paragraph response to the following question. Why do most economists put their trust in market-based solutions as opposed to direct government interventions (so called command and control approaches) to mitigate GHGs? Answer: 1. The mitigation of GHG is characterized as a public good. Greenhouse gas (GHG) is a gaseous compound that is able to absorb the infrared radiation by capturing and grasping heat in the environment. The greenhouse effect is caused by the greenhouses gases. Due to this effect, the temperature of the atmosphere rises which ultimately leads to the global warming effect. Therefore, GHG emission problem is an example of negative externality which includes some spillover cost or external costs. Negative externalities occur when the consumption of a good or service imposes harm on others who are not directly associated with either the production or the consumption of that good. GHG is considered as a public bad since it is just the opposite of public good. It gives disutility to people when consumed. Some more examples of public bad are air pollution, air pollution etc. GHG is a public bad, therefore GHG mitigation will be a public good. The people who cant pay for GHG mitigation, they can t be excluded from having the advantages of avoiding the harmful effects of the climate. Emission of GHG represents a negative externality which leads the to market failure. Therefore, the mitigation of GHG will be considered as public good. To reduce the GHG emission, two types of policy are taken: mitigation policy and adaptation policy. In mitigation policy options, there are two broad responses: regulatory approaches and the market based approaches. The main instruments for market based approach are GHG tax and emission trading schemes or ETS. These are the major implications for the mitigation for GHG. 2 a) The Minister for the Environment has a media interview about a proposed carbon tax. As the principal advisor of the Minister for the Environment, some suggestions can be made. The following three points explain the governments intervention to mitigate the climate change. Today the world is facing through many problems. One of the major problems is climate change due to air pollution. Some other problems are greenhouse gas emission, global warming etc. Climate change is an example of negative externality. The effects of climate change are increasing over time. Another feature of climate change is that significant uncertainties exist about the possible type, size and timing of impacts. To produce the socially efficient outcome will be another intervention of the government to mitigate the climate change. To gather information about the rural economies and research on how they utilize agro biodiversity to cope with the climate change is another objective of the government to mitigate the climate change. b) A carbon tax is the preferred policy than the emission trading schemes or ETS because This is a market based policy instrument that involves the behavioural change. It provides opportunities and incentives to decrease the cost of mitigation and therefore provides an efficient outcome. This policy uses the power of market price. According to many researchers, carbon pricing is the most efficient mechanism. Imposing a tax on carbon will make the market forces to reduce the demand for carbon based industries like fuels (Fahimnia et al. 2015). 3. The most economists put their trust in market based solutions as opposed to direct government interventions to mitigate GHGs. In the modern life, energy is very essential. The present method of producing the energy generates carbon dioxide and leads to the depletion of the global climate. There is a need to find a way to reduce carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions. It may be done through some alternative energy technology or by changing peoples consumption patterns focussing on the items that require less energy. The problem is associated with a large number of possible solutions. Now the difficulty is to select the correct solution that will achieve the required reduction in emission along with the minimum disruption and also economic cost. That is another problem. For instance, in decreasing the emissions from the transport, the possible solutions may be the using of more efficient private cars, more expansion of the public transport and the usage of telecommunication suc h as the email, phone calls as an alternative of face-to-face meetings. There may be some other solutions also. Another solution for government may be to recruit some experts to recognize the suitable methods of decreasing emissions and to adapt some regulations or other types of direct action to make sure that those methods are introduced properly (Grimes and Kentor 2015). Reference list: Grimes, P. and Kentor, J., 2015. Exporting the Greenhouse: Foreign Capital Penetration and CO? Emissions 1980 1996.journal of world-systems research,9(2), pp.261-275. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Choudhary, A. and Eshragh, A., 2015. Tactical supply chain planning under a carbon tax policy scheme: A case study.International Journal of Production Economics,164, pp.206-215.

Rhetorical Analysis of the “I Have a Dream” Speech free essay sample

During the mid-20th Century, racism was a huge issue in the United States, which the most prominent was the racism of African-Americans. Although all blacks were supposed to be free, under a corrupt law system, blacks were victimized mercilessly. Therefore, blacks decided to try and change the system and multiple civil rights activists and groups appeared. The most notable activist of them was Martin Luther King Jr. of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or the SCLC (Martin Luther King, Jr. Biography). Throughout the 1960s, King engaged in various civil rights boycotts and protests, helping to further the movement and gaining its eventual victory. Out of all of his civil rights-related efforts, the â€Å"I Have a Dream† speech, given on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the â€Å"March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom† in 1963 (â€Å"March on Washington For Jobs and Freedom). The speech had a massive impact as it managed to illustrate the racist prob lems of the time and provoke the audience into feeling sympathy while providing hope to the depressed African-American population. We will write a custom essay sample on Rhetorical Analysis of the â€Å"I Have a Dream† Speech or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Sadly, the speech also made the movement and King very popular, making his opponents treat him as a threat, causing him to be assassinated 5 years later and he was unable to enjoy the fruits of his work. The reason for â€Å"I Have a Dream† massive impact is due to the tense social mood of the time and that it reflects the conditions of the time, giving black activists a vision for the future. It struck directly into the hearts of blacks across America, made whites ashamed of their actions and willing to have a new start and shook society to its roots. In just 17 minutes, King influenced and informed the generations and generations of people about racial equality and fairness. According to almost all scholars, the seventeen-minute speech is a masterpiece of rhetoric (Edwards). This is obvious when analyzing the speech as one can notice that King carefully structures his speech to appeal to the different types of audience, supporting it with the three rhetorical modes of ethos, pathos and logos which are reinforced with different rhetorical tropes and schemes, marking King’s name in history. The most important of any speech is its structure – something which King does extremely well in his speech by showing the plight of the Negroes, showing the truth of the civil rights movement and that there is hope in the future. Basically, the speech’s structure is intended to appeal to the three types of audiences likely to be listening to King’s speech – the average blacks who are discriminated against, the average whites who harbor thoughts typical of that time and the militant blacks and racist supremacists who argue that blacks are evil and the civil rights movement is violent. In the first part of his speech, King, cleverly paints a picture of the plight of the Negroes and thoroughly describes their condition. For example, in the start of the essay, King says that the life of the blacks is â€Å"crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination† and that the blacks are living on a â€Å"lonely island of poverty† in the midst of a â€Å"vast ocean of material prosperity.† This first makes the whites realize how the blacks are in a terrible plight and make them dislike their actions while striking deep into the hearts of blacks as this clearly paints out their situation. Further on, King continues to emphasize this by continuing to list examples of the Negroes’ problems, which continues to strike at the Negroes as they are stirred by descriptions of their sadness and makes whites uncomfortable as they think that they are the ones responsible for this. Also, King makes references to how America has literally broken their promise to the Negroes by refusing them the rights granted in the Constitution. Therefore, the plight of the Negroes is not their fault; it is the fault of the whites. One problem with the civil rights movement, however, is that many enemies of the movement argue that activists of the movement act aggressively and use violent methods to seek their goals. This ha s caused many people to lose their support for their movement. In order to stop this, King, who was a public face for the movement at the time, states that the Negroes must conduct their struggle â€Å"on the high plane of dignity and discipline† and must not allow their â€Å"creative protest to degenerate into physical violence† for the â€Å"marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people.† Later, near the end of his speech, King continues to â€Å"preach† this point, for example by stating that he has a dream that â€Å"little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.† Through this, King intends to say that the black militants are not supported by the majority of the civil rights movement and that the movement is intent on reaching their goals nonviolently. This also has the additional effect making the w hites uncomfortable when they think how the blacks are not really the savages they think they are and are instead dignified, honorable people who continue to endure and that the whites are the true savage beasts. However, this is not the end. After portraying multiple examples of white brutality and the pain of the Negro people, however, King knows that it is important to give the Negro people a message of hope. Therefore, at the very end, King starts to talk about the future and how one day, freedom will â€Å"ring† from all across the United States and how people of all races will be able to â€Å"join hands† and be â€Å"brothers and sisters.† Overall, King intelligently uses a well-planned structure to manipulate his audience into agreeing with him by painting an image of the Negros’s plight. In his speech, in order to back up his basic structure King uses rhetorical modes, one of which is pathos, or the mode of utilizing human emotions, by making his audience no longer hate Negroes and instead hate racism and wish for a new, better world, which is part of the structure of his essay. King tries his best in the speech to make the audience sympathize with the Negroes, dislike racism and then be filled with hope of a new world without racism by using strong adjectives and metaphors. For example, King constantly describes the Negroes as being â€Å"crippled† by the â€Å"manacles of segregation† and â€Å"chains of discrimination.† Through this, King makes the audience feel that the Negroes are in great calamity; as if the Negroes had committed a crime and have to be restrained, something which King emphasizes on when he compares the situation of the Negroes as to being stranded on a â€Å"lonely island of poverty† while everybody else around them are indulging in a â€Å"ocean of material prosperity.† Therefore, through this, the audience realizes how it is not because the Negroes are stupid that they live in poverty, but because the white American society is literally holding them back. Later, King then aims to make the audience hate racism by giving them a metaphor: that racism is a â€Å"dark and desolate valley† while racial justice is a â€Å"sunlit path.† It results in the audience first realizing that their society is in that dark and desolate valley then thinking that without racism, the American society could then climb onto the sunlit path of racial justice. Throughout his speech, King does this again and again, such as writing that black children are â€Å"stripped of their selfhood† and dignity by â€Å"signs stating ‘For Whites Only’† and that black people are â€Å"judged by the color of their skin† instead of the â€Å"content of their character.† This all serves to make the audience feel ashamed of racism. Finally, King paints a picture of his vision and hope in the audience’s mind by repeating â€Å"I have a dream† followed by optimist statements, repeating â€Å"Let freedom ring!† and that one day all of â€Å"God’s children,† no matter what their race or color, will be able to be brothers and sisters without racial injustice. Overall, King effectively uses pathos in his speech, guiding the audience’s feelings to go along his plans and making them sympathize with Negroes, hate racism and be filled with a hope of an equal world. Other than pathos, King also utilizes the other two modes of rhetoric, ethos and logos, the art of using social ethics and logic and examples, although logos is used far less frequently compared to the other two modes. These two modes help in King’s structure to make the audience think that the whites have lied and broken their promises to the Negroes. In the late beginning of his speech of his speech, King writes that when America was founded, â€Å"the Constitution and Declaration of Independence† stated that all men, black or white, were to be granted the same rights. However, nowadays, America has not kept its promise to the black people King compares this to having given Negroes â€Å"a bad check,† a check which has come back marked â€Å"insufficient funds† despite the â€Å"promissory note† of the â€Å"Constitution and Declaration of Independence†. Ethically, most people believe that it is necessary to keep a promise. Therefore, thi s puts racism in a whole new light: that racism is not justified as the US has failed to deliver their promises. This helps in making whites uncomfortable about their actions – something important in King’s structure. Later on, King mentions that racial equality can only be achieved until â€Å"justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.† This deliberately makes the audience think that racial segregation is wrong and against basic moral principles. Finally, King also attacks the enforcers of racial segregation, or the police, by citing â€Å"police brutality† and insufficient living conditions for the prisoners. Meanwhile, the one example of logos in the speech is when King refers to the Emancipation Proclamation Lincoln signed 100 years earlier. King writes in the very beginning that â€Å"five score years ago,† Lincoln signed the â€Å"Emancipation Proclamation† that declared slaves free and blacks were no longer to be treated like property. King uses this piece of evidence to show that even Lincoln, one of the most admired men in US history, supported the freeing of blacks, creating an ethos appeal through the logos of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation. However, there is also a logos appeal as well because when audiences think about it, the Emancipation Proclamation, or the order to free slaves and start of racial equality, had been written a hundred years ago. Yet, in all that time, the idea of racial equality, instead of increasing, had decreased. Therefore, America should start adopting the ideas of racial equality. In summary, King’s speech also utilizes the modes of ethos and logos in the first half of his speech as the civil rights movement is based heavily in ethics and to show that Lincoln, one of the most respected Americans in history, supported the freeing of blacks and since it has been one hundred years since the black equality movement really started. To assist in his rhetorical modes, King uses rhetorical tropes in his modes such as when he alludes to several different works like the Bible, Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address and Shakespeare’s â€Å"Richard III† syncing King’s ideas with what is considered righteous by many people, makes the audience remember important parts of the past and helps audience understand the situation, all of which are important to the success of the speech. An example of this is when King writes â€Å"justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.† This is a direct biblical allusion to Amos 5:24 – â€Å"But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!† Another biblical allusion is when King writes that he has a dream that one day, â€Å"every valley shall be exalted,† every hill and mountain â€Å"made low,† all rough places will be â€Å"plain† and crooked places â€Å"straightâ⠂¬  and that the â€Å"glory of the Lord shall be revealed.† Other than the direct Christian allusion by mentioning God, this phrase also alludes the Isaiah 40:4-5 – â€Å"Every valley shall be raised up, every mountain and hill made low; the rough ground shall become level, the rugged places a plain. And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed.† King also alludes to Psalms 30:5 by writing â€Å"It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity† as the second half of Psalms 30:5 states, â€Å"weeping may remain for a night, but rejoicing comes in the morning.† All these biblical allusions remind the audience that what King says is in accordance to the Bible. Large quantities of the 1960s American population were churchgoers. Therefore, as the audience would all hold the Bible to be righteous, by making the audience think that King words are in sync with the Bible, King manages to make the audience feel as if his arguments are a ll definitely righteous and should be supported. Another allusion, this time a literary one, is to Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address when King states â€Å"Five score years ago† at the start of his speech, which is an direct allusion to the phrase â€Å"Four score and seven years ago† at the start of the Gettysburg Address. Due to the fact that the Gettysburg Address is also about human rights and that most people remember Lincoln as being a staunch supporter of blacks, this allusion makes the audience remember that one of the greatest men in history opposed segregation. The final allusion, also a literary allusion, is when King writes that the â€Å"summer of the Negro’s legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality.† This alludes to the opening lines of â€Å"Richard III,† a historical play by William Shakespeare, which are â€Å"Now is the winter of our discontent. Made glorious summer by th is sun of York.† In â€Å"Richard III,† the main character, Richard, and his brother, Edward, are constantly in a state of conflict. Therefore, through this allusion, King attempts to make the reader think that the situation between black and white men are the same – both are technically â€Å"brothers,† yet are both struggling and fighting against each other. The allusions used by King reinforces his message as they make it seems to be in sync with the Bible and make the audience that like the story of â€Å"Richard III,† black and white men, technically â€Å"brothers,† are battling each other. Through these allusions, King intends to support his ethos as the Bible is a great source of ethics, Lincoln is historically famous for his ethical beliefs and because an allusion to â€Å"Richard III† invokes the ethic that brothers should not discriminate against each other. Metaphors, another useful rhetorical trope, are essential to help audiences fully understand an idea as it compares an idea with something the audience is familiar with, which is important to bring out modes such as ethos and pathos. King uses a series of more complicated metaphors in the middle of his essay. He claims that by â€Å"the Constitution and Declaration of Independence,† the forefathers of America were â€Å"signing a promissory note† that all men, whatever color, would be granted the same rights. However, King then says in the view of the Negroes, the US government have given the Negroes a â€Å"bad check,† a bad check that does not promise them the same results that have been given to the white population. Later on, King says that many equal rights activists have been â€Å"battered by the storms of persecution† and the â€Å"winds of police brutality.† Through this metaphor, King paints the upholders of the Jim Crow laws, the laws su ppressing blacks (Jim Crow Laws), in a bad light. These two metaphors both relate to ethos as the first metaphor invokes the ethic of keeping your promises while the second metaphor involves torture, something which most of the American population was against. Finally, King uses several last metaphors when he writes that with faith, it is possible to transform the â€Å"jangling discords† of our nation into a â€Å"beautiful symphony of brotherhood.† This metaphor, on the other hand, is related to pathos as the audience immediately feels good due to the King’s choice of words. All of these metaphors are aimed to make the audience realize that continued racial injustice will lead to total chaos while racial equality leads to a beautiful society. Overall, the metaphors King uses are effective to support the ethos and pathos as they make the audience realize that the US have cheated the Negroes, that those who uphold the Jim Crow laws are evil and that it is possib le to transform the US society. Like the metaphor, the simile is useful to help the audience understand ideas and is also part of the rhetorical modes. Examples of the simile in King’s speech is when he writes that the Emancipation Proclamation came â€Å"as a joyous daybreak† to the black slaves to end the â€Å"long night of their captivity.† This simile tells and emphasizes to the audience how the Emancipation Proclamation was a great â€Å"beacon of hope† to the slaves and how they rejoiced when the received the news. Therefore, this also helps to make the audience delighted and happy for the Negroes, which means they become saddened when King tells them how 100 years later, the Negroes, however, are still not free. Also, this simile fits the mood of the speech as the speech occurred near the Lincoln Memorial. King implies to this by writing that the Emancipation Proclamation was signed by a â€Å"great American† whose â€Å"symbolic shadow† they stand in. Other simile s are â€Å"justice rolls down like waters† and â€Å"righteousness like a mighty stream.† These similes intend to tell the audience that King and his friends will not stop until justice comes down and sweep away all racism and injustice King also uses a rhetorical question, the final trope in his speech -â€Å"when will you be satisfied?† in his speech in order to trigger a flood of answers and to stir up the feelings of blacks. In the middle part of his speech, King writes that some whites ask black activists when blacks will be satisfied. King then writes that blacks will not be satisfied as long as there is racism. First, King is answering many whites: blacks will not be satisfied until everybody is equal. Then, King stirs up the feelings of the blacks with his question when he includes all sorts of examples of racial injustice to colored people when he answers himself. This is intended to support pathos as it is effective in stirring up the black audience’s feelings and anger. The rhetorical question is useful to King because they answer questions posed by the whites and stir up the Negroes’ feelings about racism. Other than tropes, though, King uses schemes as well, such as epistrophe. He uses epistrophe when he writes â€Å"With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day.† Epistrophe, which is when a certain word at the end of a clause is repeated again and again, is effective in this case as it puts emphasis on the fact that the civil rights movement will always work together and will never forget or leave anybody to suffer alone. Without this, many civil rights activists might come under the impression that they have been forgotten whenever they got arrested or prosecuted and would stop working for the civil rights movement. King utilizes this to support his pathos as it effectively motivates the civil rights movement. Therefore, the world is informed that the civil rights movements are united together and to all activists they are not alone. Martin Luther King uses anaphora multiple times in his speech as it is also closely related to the rhetorical mode of pathos. Examples are when he repeats â€Å"One hundred years later† three times in one paragraph and â€Å"Now is the time† four times in another paragraph. Through constant repetition, King aims to emphasize his point in the reader’s mind. Another example, when asked when Negros will be satisfied, King repeats â€Å"We will not be satisfied† multiple times, followed by an example of injustice suffered by African-Americans – which impresses on the audience (this was broadcast on live TV as well) that blacks will not stop until they are not discriminated against. Other than those occasions, there are other examples, such as when King writes â€Å"I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed†¦Ã¢â‚¬  â€Å"I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of form er slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood†¦. every valley shall be exalted†¦and the glory of the Lord†¦shall see it together.† By repeating â€Å"I have a dream,† King emphasizes the fact that he can see a new America, an America free from racial injustice and cruelty. King also writes how â€Å"let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire†¦from Stone Mountain of Georgia†¦Lookout Mountain of Tennessee†¦hill and molehill of Mississippi†¦let freedom ring.† The anaphora used here emphasizes King’s point and wish for freedom from all parts of the nation, evidenced by how he references to places all over America. It also backs up King’s pathos as the constant repetition is very useful for arousing the audience’s emotions, especially when combined with the moving content anaphora is often used in conjunction with. Overall, the mult iple use of anaphora in King’s speech emphasizes the point to the audience that the blacks will not stop until the Jim Crow laws are gone and that when those laws are gone, a new America will emerge. Throughout the speech, another scheme King uses frequently is parallelism, the strategy of repeating similar clauses, several times. Parallelism is useful to emphasize things and ideas to the audience, which, like all the other tropes and schemes. Early in his speech, King writes â€Å"riches of freedom† and â€Å"security of justice† and then â€Å"justice rolls down like waters† and â€Å"righteousness like a mighty stream.† In these two examples, King is using parallelism to express that the African American wants justice and freedom by repeating them next to each other and mentally connecting them in the reader’s mind, which is also connected with pathos as the terms King uses subtly emphasize those words and create good feelings in the reader. As campaigning Negroes have been prosecuted by the police, King makes a mention of them when he writes that those activists have been â€Å"battered by the storms of persecution† and â€Å"stagge red by the winds of police brutality.† This emphasizes to the audience that many racial demonstrators, despite being brutally treated (which supports ethos as it is a reference to police brutality), have not given up on their efforts. At the end of his speech, King uses parallelism two more times when he writes â€Å"Let freedom ring† multiple times followed by â€Å"from (American place name).† King decides to again emphasize the importance of freedom by using parallelism and by mentioning place names to implant in the reader of how they should â€Å"let freedom ring† from across the US. Finally to cap his speech King writes how one day when â€Å"all of God’s children,† no matter if they are â€Å"black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics† will be able to sing together â€Å"in the words of the old Negro spiritual, ‘Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!’† In this case, King expresses how all people in the world, despite their differences, are God’s children and should not be discriminated against by putting almost all of the different groups of people together in a parallel structure. Both of those two final examples are pathos-related as the first example creates good feelings and is inspirational while the final example creates hope for the future in the audience. In summary, parallelism connects different points and, like all other devices, tells the audience of how blacks want justice and that how all people of the world should not be discriminated against. Antithesis is when two utterly different ideas are put together, which is useful for grabbing attention and emphasizing. King uses it in his speech in order to express all his points. First, King writes that â€Å"the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity.† This antithesis makes the audience realize that the Negroes have been left behind and ignored while the rest of modern society has charged forward into prosperity and fortune. From this revelation, the audience will also realize that it is no fault of the Negro that they have been left behind – in contrast, modern society have been dragging them back through racism. In order to dispel any misguided ideas that whites have of the Negroes’ fortune, King tells them directly that Negroes are in poverty as everybody is blocking them from entering the ocean of â€Å"material prosperity.† The second time King uses antithesis is when he states that â€Å" Nineteen Sixty-Three is not an end, but a beginning,† which he aims to express that the revolution will not stop at 1963; rather it will have a new beginning. Finally, King uses antithesis one more time at the end of his speech, when he writes â€Å"when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands.† The pairs he mentions are all the direct opposites of each other, yet he says that they will all join hands together and be friends. King implies that one day, all differences will fall away as, no matter what our race and color, we are God’s children. Overall, antithesis is used by King to grab the audience’s attention and emphasize to them that the Negroes’ poverty is the fault of the whites, that the revolution will not end at the Washington march and that all men are God’s children. Finally, the last scheme used by King is the isocolon, or repetition of grammatical structure in several clauses, as it builds rhythm and can be used to connect ideas. An example of this is when King writes â€Å"Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana.† Through this use of isocolon, King lifts the hearts of blacks and tells them not to give up and continue their cause as someday, the blacks will be free from discrimination. Although those place names King mentions means nothing to the bystander, the audience King was facing would have recognized them as places where segregation was strictly enforced. Another example of isocolon is in the final part of King’s speech, when he writes â€Å"from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city† after writing about freedom ringing from all parts of America. This isocolon simply summarizes his claim of freedom ringing everywhere. I t creates a good rhythm and connects ideas. These two usages of isocolon are intended to boost the pathos of King’s speech as they both boost the emotions of the audience. Overall, King uses the isocolon to tell blacks to never give up as one day, freedom will ring everywhere. Although all of the rhetorical strategies are interesting, the most important aspect is how they relate to each other and the effect they create. As the structure of â€Å"I Have a Dream† is vital to its success, King carefully tries to relate all of his rhetorical strategies with his structure. For example, part of King’s structure is intended to make the audience harbor bad feelings about racism. To achieve this, King uses the rhetorical strategy of pathos along with metaphors and other rhetorical tropes and schemes to make the audience feel for the blacks. Also, King carefully chooses the rhetorical strategies in his essay in order to make them fit with the structure. For example, anaphora and parallelism combines in the speech to create the famous â€Å"I have a dream† and â€Å"let freedom ring† repetition. The constant repetition coupled with King’s deep inspirational voice serves to inspire the audience, audible when cheers are heard in the recording of King’s speech as he says â€Å"I have a dream† and â€Å"let freedom ring.† After hearing these repetitions, the viewer is filled with hope. This is in alignment with King’s structure as King intends for the end to be about hope for the future and those two repetitions both occur at the end. In brief, the rhetorical strategies of King’s speech combine to create a combining effect, supporting and reinforcing each other. In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr’s most famous speech was the â€Å"I Have a Dream† speech given in 1963 during one of the most famous marches in history, the 200,000-strong â€Å"March on Washington For Jobs and Freedom.† At the time, America was in the grips of racism and segregation, making the lives of many blacks living hell. â€Å"I Have a Dream,† however, played a major step into changing it. It managed to inspire a generation of blacks to never give up and made thousands of white Americans bitterly ashamed of their actions, forging a new start for society. Even now, it continues to make generations of people, not just Americans, to give up their racist beliefs and advocate social colorblindness. Without King, America would be probably still heavily segregated. Other than the speech’s heartwarming and moving content, King’s effective structure along with the usage of all three rhetorical modes and certain rhetorical tropes and sc hemes has revealed the reason â€Å"I Have a Dream† as a masterpiece of rhetoric and it persuades hundreds of thousands of people support the blacks instead of treating them unfairly. Works Cited Edwards, Stevie. â€Å"Analysis of Martin Luther King’s I Have a Dream Speech† presentationmagazine.com. Presentation Magazine. n.d. Web. 12 August 2012. â€Å"Jim Crow Laws.† National Park Service. US Government., n.d. Web. 16 August. 2012 â€Å"March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.† Martin Luther King, Jr. And the Global Freedom Struggle. Stanford University., n.d. Web. 9 August. 2012. â€Å"Martin Luther King, Jr. Biography.† biography.com. n.p., n.d. Web. 9 August. 2012.